SEO, AEO and GEO in 64 seconds
The homepage film, with the full transcript and the evidence behind it. Watch how a diagnosis becomes one ranked fix order, not another dashboard.
Watch the film
Transcript
You’ve done everything they told you. The blog. The backlinks. The meta descriptions. And you still can’t tell if any of it worked.
That’s not a failure of effort. It’s a failure of diagnosis.
You’ve bought the tool. You’ve paid for the report. And you still have 641 problems and no idea which one matters.
You don’t need another dashboard. You need someone to tell you what’s actually costing you money — and what to fix first.
That’s what we do. Your pages, your map pack, your links. We find the leaks, rank them by what they’re worth, and give you the order. We did it on our own site: 641 errors to one. 41 broken pages to zero.
Every month you wait, the same pages keep leaking. The only question is whether you find it before your competitor does.
You’re not behind. You’re just holding a map with no “you are here.”
Start with the free snapshot. Three minutes. See where you are. Then decide.
What the film claims, and what it does not
The film makes three claims. First, a tool gives data; a diagnosis gives an order. Second, the order should be ranked by what the leak is worth, not by how many warnings a crawl returns. Third, the proof is our own site: a dated Semrush audit that moved from 641 errors and 41 broken pages to one error and zero broken pages over five fix passes.
It does not claim that every site will move the same way. It does not claim a ranking, traffic or revenue result. The before and after are dated evidence from one property, published with the limits stated.
The next step
If the film describes your situation, start with the free snapshot: a public review gap, website basics and one action, with no card. If you already know you want a ranked fix order, the Revenue-Leak Audit is the paid version.
The evidence behind the numbers
The film cites a Semrush Site Audit of this site. The before: 491 pages, 641 errors, 41 broken pages and 75% site health. The after: 324 pages, one error, zero broken pages and 94% site health, across five fix passes. The remaining 491 warnings were left on purpose because not every warning changes a decision.
That is one property, measured on dated scans, with the campaign settings visible. It is not a controlled experiment and it is not a promise that another site will move the same way. What it does show is the method: read the evidence, rank the leaks by what they cost, fix in that order, then re-scan the same way.
How to use the film
If you are a founder, watch for the moment the film names the problem you already feel: you have the tool, the report and the list, but not the order. If you are a marketer, watch for the three surfaces it names — pages, map pack and links — and check which one your own reporting cannot separate.
The film is deliberately price-free and tool-free. The next decision is not “which vendor” but “which problem first”. That is what the free snapshot and the paid audit are for.
Questions about the film
Why does the film not mention a price?
Because the homepage is a consideration page, not a checkout. Price and pack choice belong on the audit pages, where the scope is stated. A brand film that quotes a price before the problem is understood asks for the wrong decision.
Is the 641-to-1 result a client result?
No. It is our own site, audited in public. The before and after are dated Semrush scans of the same campaign. We publish it because a method you can inspect is more useful than a logo wall we cannot prove.
What should I do after watching?
Start with the free snapshot if you want a first look with no card. Choose the Revenue-Leak Audit if you want the full ranked fix order, the evidence pack and a dated report you can act on.
Dated guidance. No ranking, traffic or revenue guarantee.